On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:41 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > So, can we assume that the current code can only cause the problem in
> > CCA builds bot not in any practical scenario because after having a
> > lock on relation probably there shouldn't be any invalidation which
> > leads to this problem?
>
>
> In short: the value of CCA testing is to model sinval overruns
> happening at any point where they could happen. The real-world
> odds of one happening at any given instant are low, but they're
> never zero.
>
Thanks for the explanation. I have read your patch and it looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
