Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Ki0syxt4S2FVHmaswE1zexzLMW4yR5p6h_kSsOOa=SvA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:59 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-16 12:37:57 +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
> > The patch creates 100_bugs.pl
>
> What's the story behind 100_bugs.pl? This name clearly is copied from
> src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl - but I've never understood why that is
> outside of the normal numbering space.
>

Yeah, I have also previously wondered about this name for
src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl. My guess is that it has been kept
to distinguish it from the other feature tests which have numbering
starting from 001.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: odd buildfarm failure - "pg_ctl: control file appears to be corrupt"
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce list_reverse() to make lcons() usage less inefficient