On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 6:30 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 4:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> > 2.
> > @@ -2482,6 +2681,8 @@ DropSubscription(DropSubscriptionStmt *stmt,
> > bool isTopLevel)
> > deleteDependencyRecordsFor(SubscriptionRelationId, subid, false);
> > deleteSharedDependencyRecordsFor(SubscriptionRelationId, subid, 0);
> >
> > + drop_sub_conflict_log_table(subid, subname, subconflictlogrelid);
> >
> > It would be better to drop the table before cleaning up the dependency
> > record. Right now, it is okay even in current order because dependency
> > removal is trying to remove where subid is depender.
>
> So whats your suggestion change it now or not? I feel either way is fine.
>
Let's change now itself.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.