Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KVryBVTq_CrMcJeGKPX1D8rezdTpZteOXLnx58jAbu+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 1:54 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 1:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Okay, but that doesn't mean using it here is bad. I am personally fine
> > with a message containing something like "... in transaction
> > id 740 with commit timestamp 2021-08-10 14:44:38.058174+05:30" but I
> > won't mind if you and or others find some other way convenient. Any
> > opinion from others?
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on this but in terms of consistency we
> often use like "transaction %u" in messages when showing XID value,
> rather than "transaction [id|ID|identifier]":
>
..
>
> Therefore, perhaps a message like "... in transaction 740 with commit
> timestamp 2021-08-10 14:44:38.058174+05:30" is better in terms of
> consistency with other messages?
>

+1.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Added schema level support for publication.