Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KVD+0mUxAt_4DQPqKxDS_WPucDj2-ZgUqEmzVgLs1gpw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 11:32 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There is one issue with the patch, the problem is that for some data
> type index operator class type is different than actual table column
> type,
>

Can you please share the test case as well showing this problem? We
may even want to include that in the regression tests for this patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Osama Abdul Qader
Date:
Subject: Re: Severe performance degradation with concurrent updates due to excessive EvalPlanQual (EPQ) re‑evaluation
Next
From: Greg Burd
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Corruption Issue: Fix missing tts_tid in ExecForceStoreHeapTuple