Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KPvbtpCJUuU6ZaZ=6BuBEvAzLCHNniNG98g0tOo3CkNA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 2:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 4:49 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for the first version patch, I also felt the first version is
> > easily understandable.
> >
>
> Okay, please find the slightly updated version (changed a comment and
> commit message). Unless there are more comments, I'll push this in a
> day or two.
>

oops, forgot to attach the patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_waldump: add test for coverage