Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 9:02 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 5:42 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 4)
> > > For the DETAIL part of resume and stop messages, how about these:
> > >
> > > The retention duration for information used in conflict detection has
> > > exceeded the limit of xx.
> > > The retention duration for information used in conflict detection is
> > > now within the acceptable limit of xx.
> > > The retention duration for information used in conflict detection is
> > > now indefinite.
> > >
> >
> > Similar to the previous point, will it be better to keep it short by
> > using "conflict detection info", for example, it will lead to message
> > like "The retention duration for conflict detection info is now
> > indefinite."?
> >
>
> Works for me as I understand the context. But could it be confusing
> for users? Could it be inferred as info about conflicts rather than
> info used while detecting conflicts?
>

Fair point. We can retain your proposed message.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.