Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KDKnvwEx+h4vM8gsivv5i8E1PRxhnjK3Hzt91DETYTfw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 11, 2026 at 2:37 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Okay that makes sense.  Here is the updated version of the patch
> changes compared to previous version
>

Thanks for the new version. We can combine 0001 and 0002 now but most
importantly you seem to forget including the code optimizations
suggested by Hou-San and me in emails [1][2].

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFvd2n92EXzt7VNRGxQCMkK1t2%2B6RA9SwQ5j9DHMwJcWCNoK1Q%40mail.gmail.com
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1L-yBio2zbSVsKQ9LCy8orszXviqORHp%3Dsg2jSq%3D76D2A%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions