On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> (But it might be worth choosing slightly less
> >> generic object names, to avoid a conflict against other sub-tests
> >> later in that script.)
>
> > The function name and statement name seems okay to me. How about
> > changing the table name to fooarr or arrtest?
>
> Up to you.
>
Okay, I have pushed the test case patch on HEAD. Attached is the
code-fix patch, let's wait for a day so that we have all the results
which can help us to discuss the merits of this patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
