Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1K23TAPTxQk2AYL6PFqWE3XknaC3RxC=_YT53RjLZKJFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:40 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:43 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This and other results shared by you look promising. Will there be any
> > improvement in workloads related to clog buffer usage?
>
> I did not understand this question can you explain this a bit?
>

I meant to ask about the impact of this patch on accessing transaction
status via TransactionIdGetStatus(). Shouldn't we expect some
improvement in accessing CLOG buffers?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Next
From: Jelte Fennema
Date:
Subject: Re: Add new for_each macros for iterating over a List that do not require ListCell pointer