Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1K0cuL0JH2FAby=epzz7XRAtCqdFANFU_=37Tx=k6sTWA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:58 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:30 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 2)
> >> Currently pg_dump is dumping even the default resolvers configuration.
> >> As an example if I have not changed default configuration for say
> >> sub1, it still dumps all:
> >>
> >> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1 CONNECTION '..' PUBLICATION pub1 WITH (....)
> >> CONFLICT RESOLVER (insert_exists = 'error', update_differ =
> >> 'apply_remote', update_exists = 'error', update_missing = 'skip',
> >> delete_differ = 'apply_remote', delete_missing = 'skip');
> >>
> >> I am not sure if we need to dump default resolvers. Would like to know
> >> what others think on this.
> >>

Normally, we don't add defaults in the dumped command. For example,
dumpSubscription won't dump the options where the default is
unchanged. We shouldn't do it unless we have a reason for dumping
defaults.

> >> 3)
> >> Why in 002_pg_dump.pl we have default resolvers set explicitly?
> >>
> > In 003_pg_dump.pl, default resolvers are not set explicitly, that is the regexp to check the pg_dump generated
commandfor creating subscriptions. This is again connected to your 2nd question. 
>
> Okay so we may not need this change if we plan to *not *dump defaults
> in pg_dump.
>
> Another point about 'defaults' is regarding insertion into the
> pg_subscription_conflict table. We currently do insert default
> resolvers into 'pg_subscription_conflict' even if the user has not
> explicitly configured them.
>

I don't see any problem with it. BTW, if we don't do it, I think
wherever we are referring the resolvers for a conflict, we need some
special handling for default and non-default. Am I missing something?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: list of acknowledgments for PG17
Next
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE ONLY