Re: Misleading comment in prologue of ReorderBufferQueueMessage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Misleading comment in prologue of ReorderBufferQueueMessage
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JwwvM9+OO9gZB-pfm-=jSdkgNsS-gvz5ZgJO1j_hh80A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Misleading comment in prologue of ReorderBufferQueueMessage  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:37 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> How about something like below:
>> A transactional message is queued to be processed upon commit and a
>> non-transactional message gets processed immediately.
>
>
> Used this one. PFA patch.
>

Pushed!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables