Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Jus+3sKpKZ_7JoQ6FNxeSFWzHv+nXx9Hf=cOBhgtS1fw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@heterodb.com>)
Responses Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:35 AM Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@heterodb.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Let me remind the thread again.
> I'm waiting for the fix getting committed for a month...
>

It seems you would also like to see this back-patched.  I am not sure
if that is a good idea as there is some risk of breaking existing
usage.  Tom, do you have any opinion on this patch?  It seems to me
you were thinking to have a separate hook for partial paths, but the
patch has solved the problem by moving the hook location.  I think
whatever is the case we should try to reach some consensus and move
forward with this patch as KaiGai-San is waiting from quite some time.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Make drop database safer
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression