Re: Skipping schema changes in publication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Jjm+w3hEGgsDu_r1Pysez=8mmtGu6=XwPE4MuH+eYG8Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Skipping schema changes in publication  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 7:06 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 8.
> There needs to be additional tests to confirm that the syntax has the
> same flexibility as TABLE inclusion lists do
>
> e.g. all these variations below are valid and equivalent:
> ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, t2, t3, t4);
> ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, t2, TABLE t3, t4);
> ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, t2, TABLE t3, t4);
> ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, TABLE t2, TABLE t3, TABLE t4);
>

From all of the above, test with any one variant is okay. Let's not
add tests unless they test some different variant of syntax.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Fix typos in pg_bsd_indent: "dont" -> "don't" in comments Anexo: o arquivo
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial COPY of Logical Replication is too slow