Re: Skipping schema changes in publication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JWz=+-zEhQRszrGEbOzYKReXtsS9hGycWubHV8v2U-QA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Skipping schema changes in publication  (Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 10:15 AM Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We did not implement the EXCEPT clause for ALL SEQUENCES to avoid
> additional complexity in the patch.
>

Fair enough.

> And thought of implementing it
> after this patch gets committed.
> What do you suggest? Is it ok or should we also implement EXCEPT
> clause for ALL SEQUENCES for this patch itself?
>

I am fine with doing it as a separate patch but let's try to get that
done immediately after the main patch (FOR ALL TABLES EXCEPT ...) is
committed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition
Next
From: Henson Choi
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition