Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JSEn=UuTiYiAwqAWWEmLvMtnPMQ2+my0X8diEgtG6LqA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 2:31 PM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 10:41, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 9:31 AM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Attached are the patches from master back up to 94 branch.
> > >
> > > PG 9.4 and 9.5 have a common patch to be applied :
> > > pg94_95_use_vfd_for_logrep.patch
> > > From PG 9.6 onwards, each version has a separate patch.
> > >
> > > For PG 9.6, there is no logical decoding perl test file. So I have
> > > made a new file 006_logical_decoding_spill.pl that has only the
> > > specific testcase. Also, for building the test_decoding.so, I had to
> > > add the EXTRA_INSTALL=contrib/test_decoding line in the
> > > src/test/recovery/Makefile, because this is the first time we are
> > > using the plugin in the 9.6 tap test.
> > >
> >
> > I am not sure if we need to go that far for 9.6 branch.  If the other
> > tests for logical decoding are not present, then I don't see why we
> > need to create a new test file for this test only.  Also, I think this
> > will make the patch the same for 9.4,9.5 and 9.6.
>
> Ok. I tested pg94_95_use_vfd_for_logrep.patch for 9.6 branch, and it
> works there. So please use this patch for all the three branches.
>

Pushed!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: parallel vacuum options/syntax
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Decade indication