Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JPWawfhB655sM9CBxcWNB2hYXPTkFN1JhmYeNqCP+SaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
>> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
>
> okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
>

Thanks, this version looks good to me.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Next
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation