Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JNVHTQ_yE7XqsKNgS2aR7_No0ymOvFFU_Jk5j7jpmkgg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>)
Responses Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Julien Rouhaud
<julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote:
> Or should we allow setting it to -1 for instance to disable the limit?
>

By disabling the limit, do you mean to say that only
max_parallel_workers_per_gather will determine the workers required or
something else?  If earlier, then I am not sure if it is good idea,
because it can cause some confusion to the user about usage of both
the parameters together.



-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: ToDo: API for SQL statement execution other than SPI