Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JHBqwtGcdjRnaCoD+_1G87pFnVw3AJjyBGx+YTN=uZTg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:41 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:38 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> PSA v2 of this WalRcvExceResult patch (it is same as v1 but includes
> some PG doc updates).
> This applies OK on top of v30 of the main patch.
>

Thanks, I have integrated these changes into the main patch and
additionally made some changes to comments and docs. I have also fixed
the function name inconsistency issue you reported and ran pgindent.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hou, Zhijie"
Date:
Subject: RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] bit XOR aggregate functions