Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1J8QqgyysqoFn6=q8zButwtJPbLGWMYC-48NO6ANj0P=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 7:06 PM Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > This patch has been around for some time now, the last version fails to
> > > apply cleanly and in-depth reviews have happened.  I am moving that to
> > > the next CF, waiting on its author.
> >
> > Unfortunately, nothing was changed since then, so there is already some amount
> > of unaddressed review feedback. I'll move this patch to "Returned with
> > feedback".
> >
>
> Craig Ringer mentioned about this thread to me recently.
>
> This effort has seen decent reviews from Craig, Andres and Michael
> already. So, I thought of refreshing it to work against latest master
> HEAD.
>

Thanks for picking up this.  However, I noticed that previously
Horiguchi-San has given some comments on this patch [1] which doesn't
seem to be addressed or at least not all of them are addressed.  It is
possible that you would have already addressed those, but in that
case, it would be good if you respond to his email as well.  If those
are not addressed, then it will be good to address those.


[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180322.211148.187821341.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jamison, Kirk"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor