On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > Attached should fix the reported warnings but as I am not getting
> > those warnings on my system so can't confirm but otherwise, the patch
> > works as expected. I am planning to push this unless you or Peter have
> > any comments.
>
> Personally I'd get rid of the option for ReplicationSlotNameForTablesync
> to allocate the result buffer.
>
Sounds reasonable and the updated patch attached.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.