On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:36 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Just to confirm - you'd prefer backpatching errhint_internal() to v17 and
> > earlier branches, and then updating the patch to use it to avoid double
> > translation, right?
>
> Exactly, but I want to ask other Seniors as well.
>
I don't think it is important enough to backpatch errhint_internal to
v17 and earlier branches. We can let double translation happen with
the use of errhint or we can even consider this as a HEAD only
improvement because this is not a blocking issue even when it happens.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.