Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1J3DEx_Fez7QOPWJ5g4dA2osB6gq7WW6_7E6qkLmegTqg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 12:16 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> PSA v4, now combined as Vignesh suggested, and with the extra space also fixed.
>

I would like to explicitly mention in the commit message that "Tag for
included publications was a pre-existing behavior but it is better to
change it for making it consistent with excluded publications tag. So,
how about a commit message as follows: "psql: Improve describe footer
titles for publications.

The psql describe (`\d`) footer titles were previously unintuitive
when listing publications that included or excluded specific tables.
Even though the tag for included publications was pre-existing, it is
better to update it to "Included in publications:" to match the
phrasing of the "Excluded from publications:" tag.

Footer titles for sequence and schema descriptions have been updated
similarly to maintain consistency."

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
Next
From: Matheus Alcantara
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.