Re: Questions about logicalrep_worker_launch() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Questions about logicalrep_worker_launch()
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1J17Le_Xx4BmGXa-KubmuBaw7xRhvok7WqzsY_5heyK+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Questions about logicalrep_worker_launch()  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 10:27 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Additionally, shall we try to reproduce this case for parallel apply workers?
>
> I noticed this issue while reading the code, so I haven't actually reproduced it.
> Are you saying it's not possible to reproduce this in practice?
>

No, the idea was that if we are changing the code, it is better to
test it via a testcase instead of changing based on assumptions.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: fixing CREATEROLE