Re: WAL usage calculation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+psttu3wEWkHPvzVTi6Jvsy=c4Z8cCmCU0WPUmT18+Fg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL usage calculation patch  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:07 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:00 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Also, I forgot to mention that let's not base this on buffer usage
patch for create index
(v10-0002-Allow-parallel-index-creation-to-accumulate-buff) because as
per recent discussion I am not sure about its usefulness.  I think we
can proceed with this patch without
v10-0002-Allow-parallel-index-creation-to-accumulate-buff as well.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: User Interface for WAL usage data
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow continuations in "pg_hba.conf" files