Re: WAL usage calculation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+ZryD3mCYVSmrLOmc8fw-oL0UZkDm2oUwQNQNax4KvJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL usage calculation patch  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 4.  Currently, we are combining all full-page write
> force/normal/consistency checks in one category.  I am not sure
> whether it will be good information to know how many are force_fpw and
> how many are normal_fpw?
>

We can do it if we want but I am not sure how useful it will be.  I
think we can always enhance this information if people really need
this and have a clear use-case in mind.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Next
From: Sergei Kornilov
Date:
Subject: Re: recovery_target_action=pause with confusing hint