On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:04 PM, PG Bug reporting form
<noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 15039
> Logged by: lixian zou
> Email address: zoulx1982@163.com
> PostgreSQL version: 10.0
> Operating system: source code
> Description:
>
> hi,
> i read hash index code , and found in _hash_addovflpage function, there is
> such code :
> if (metap->hashm_firstfree == orig_firstfree)
> {
> metap->hashm_firstfree = bit + 1;
> MarkBufferDirty(metabuf);
> }
>
> i found no any chang for metap,metap->hashm_firstfree,and initial the two
> variable is equal, so maybe the if statement is redundant?
>
The hashm_firstfree can be changed by a concurrent session as we
release and reacquire the lock on a metapage while trying to get the
bitmap page. See, below code:
_hash_addovflpage
{
..
..
for (;;)
{
..
/* Release exclusive lock on metapage while reading bitmap page */
LockBuffer(metabuf, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
..
/* Reacquire exclusive lock on the meta page */
LockBuffer(metabuf, BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE);
}
..
if (metap->hashm_firstfree == orig_firstfree)
{
metap->hashm_firstfree = bit + 1;
MarkBufferDirty(metabuf);
}
..
}
I think pgsql-hackers is the better place to get clarifications related to code.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
