Re: WAL consistency check facility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+RH=nfN+LA2n8k-2ss2pfK-SH88QOtNKKhE5xBoR_=iA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> I think you should add this as part of the default testing for both
> check and installcheck. I can't imagine why we'd have it and not use
> it during testing.
>

The actual consistency checks are done during redo (replay), so not
sure whats in you mind for enabling it with check or installcheck.  I
think we can run few recovery/replay tests with this framework.  Also
running the tests under this framework could be time-consuming as it
logs the entire page for each WAL record we write and then during
replay reads the same.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: shm_mq_set_sender() crash