Re: 9.5 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: 9.5 release notes
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+C2Yji4WLFOwGia6J4kdcTurcidx-btj2i5K7wfk3mPA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.5 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: 9.5 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:02:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> >
> >     On 06/10/2015 09:50 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >     > Also shall we mention about below in Migrations to 9.5 section
> >     >
> >     > "pg_basebackup will not not work in tar mode against 9.4 and older
> >     servers,
> >     >  as we have introduced a new protocol option in that mode."
> >
> >     AFAIK, pg_basebackup has never worked across versions.  So there's no
> >     reason for this note.
> >
> >
> > It has. The resulting backup has not been usable cross version, but
> > pg_basebackup itself has. Though not always, and I'm not sure we've ever
> > claimed it was supported, but it has worked.
>
> So we should still mention it in the release notes?
>

If it has never lead to usable backup's for cross version backup, then I think
there is no pressing need to mention it.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Collection of memory leaks for ECPG driver