On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 11:34 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with the proposed patch and this behavior. It is on the lines
> of what Tom proposed as one of the ways to address the issue raised in
> his initial email. Also, it follows the existing behavior in cases
> like view<->function dependency as shown by you in this email, and to
> some extent subscription<->publication dependency as shown in email
> [1].
>
> Let's wait till the beginning of the next CF to see if there are other
> suggestions or any arguments against this proposed change.
>
I am planning to push Vignesh's proposed patch in the email (1) in a
day or two unless there are objections or any other comments on the
patch.
(1) - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1TQqBC5ZP5BsNf2LKVu1kEJNJn2spFwbAtyLn1FoAFGQ%40mail.gmail.com
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
