Re: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+7QbQz1ZPQiZ4oPNZvTeqpNefK25k7vcOeVBLUXN1dNA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber  ("Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Responses RE: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 2:31 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> When reviewing some parallel apply related codes, I noticed a bug in the
> parallel apply worker, similar to the issue discussed in this thread.
>
> The issue is that the logical replication parallel apply worker may erroneously
> advance the origin progress during an error or unsuccessful apply. This can lead
> to transaction loss, as these transactions will not be resent by the server.
> Commit 3f28b2fc addressed a similar issue in both the apply worker and table
> sync worker.
>
> The original fix involved registering a before_shmem_exit callback to reset the
> origin information, preventing the worker from advancing it during transaction
> abortion on shutdown. The attached patch registers the same callback for the
> parallel apply worker, ensuring consistent behavior across all workers.
>

Thanks for reporting the issue and patch.

+# Test the ability to re-apply a transaction when a parallel apply worker fails
+# to prepare the transaction due to insufficient max_prepared_transactions
+# setting.
+$node_subscriber->append_conf('postgresql.conf',

How does the test ensure that error is raised by parallel apply
worker? I see that in the previous test, we set
'debug_logical_replication_streaming = immediate', so that should help
to invoke parallel apply worker. But is there a more direct way to
ensure the same? Can we test for LOG like: "ERROR:  logical
replication parallel apply worker exited due to error"?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather than ROLERECURSE_PRIVS?
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Two issues with version checks in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION