Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+63pNvmdWEMMbhjaf+hrakxg3FZCG3wthTRfXYhMQxFg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 8:54 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:26 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> >> The fix seems sensible to me.
>
> > Thanks, I think it is better to wait for a day or two as yesterday
> > only we stamped 13 and we need to backpatch this.
>
> Right, please avoid pushing anything non-critical to REL_13_STABLE
> until you see the git tag appear.  I doubt we will need to re-wrap
> the tarballs, but you never know.
>

Pushed now. Sorry Peter, I forgot to give you reviewer credit in the
commit message but I really appreciate your nod for this patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Next
From: Alexey Kondratov
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrency issue in pg_rewind