Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+-Gat6y5PRdu4y5xhKZrv=MeOFKDJkdQMoSoJNKbLVFg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 3:51 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 3:05 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 11:12 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:39 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here, the test is expecting 2 prepared transactions corresponding to
> > > > two subscriptions but it waits for just one subscription via
> > > > appname_copy. It should wait for the second subscription using
> > > > $appname as well.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > I agree with this analysis. The test needs to wait for both
> > > subscriptions to catch up.
> > > Attached is a patch that addresses this issue.
> >
> > The changes look good to me.
> >
>
> The patch to the test code posted by Ajin LGTM also.
>

Pushed.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication empty transactions
Next
From: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: [PATCH]Comment improvement in publication.sql