Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+-CkA62eeNVB3HH_Ss1JSOyFLmS+M93yWw6W+x8O91Ng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As Ashutosh suggests I will go more for the backpatching approach because the synchronized_standby_slots parameter
impactsthe last 2 major versions and this problem is critical on production environments. 
> >
>
> Fair enough. Let's wait for the related issue being discussed in email
> [1] to be fixed.
>

As the other patch is committed
(f33e60a53a9ca89b5078df49416acae20affe1f5), can you update and prepare
backbranch patches for this fix as well?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with query_is_distinct_for() and grouping sets
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Free memory allocated by waitonlock_error_callback()