On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As Ashutosh suggests I will go more for the backpatching approach because the synchronized_standby_slots parameter
impactsthe last 2 major versions and this problem is critical on production environments.
> >
>
> Fair enough. Let's wait for the related issue being discussed in email
> [1] to be fixed.
>
As the other patch is committed
(f33e60a53a9ca89b5078df49416acae20affe1f5), can you update and prepare
backbranch patches for this fix as well?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.