Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1++Fw11dDTU7jfdhc0BGpdYmh6Q5HcCXM6XJp_hpuJ-Gw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
RE: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 1:49 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:50:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>>> Allow specification of physical standbys that must be synchronized
> >>>>> before they are visible to subscribers (Hou Zhijie, Shveta Malik)
> >
> > it seems like the name ought to have some connection to
> > synchronization.  Perhaps something like "synchronized_standby_slots"?
>
> IMHO that might be a bit too close to synchronous_standby_names.
>

Right, but better than the current one. The other possibility could be
wait_for_standby_slots.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add pg_get_acl() function get the ACL for a database object
Next
From: Robins Tharakan
Date:
Subject: Re: recoveryCheck/008_fsm_truncation is failing on dodo in v14- (due to slow fsync?)