Re: Command Triggers, v16 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Command Triggers, v16
Date
Msg-id CAA-aLv7m6-k+E52HFMLFz33WhFeiXe_qxN==7+=nFOvVmdYU9w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Command Triggers, v16  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26 March 2012 21:36, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Personally, I am about at the point where I'd like to punt everything
>> and move on.  As nice as it would be to squeeze a few more things into
>> 9.2, there WILL be a 9.3.  If a few less people had submitted
>> half-baked code at the last minute and a few more people had helped
>> with review, we'd be done by now.
>
> Well, wait a minute. There's a difference between half-baked and
> reacting to a review that changes the goal of a patch. My idea of the

I think Robert was referring to patches in general.

Thom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpoint patches
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)