On 18 March 2014 18:16, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-03-18 18:12:25 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>> I'd have put this in a patch, but I don't know if the output in the
>> example is wrong, or just dependent on environmental factors.
>
> It's out of date, it should be integer now, so please submit a bug.
>
> I wonder if we should change stuff that types are always schema
> prefixed, instead of just when required because of search_path?
Patch attached.
--
Thom
