On 19 October 2011 05:20, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> I wouldn't add extra special checks for that. It might not be
>> completely unreasonable to have a standby that no one can connect to,
>> for example.
>
> Well, you couldn't monitor its state then, so I don't find that example
> very convincing. But if you were intent on having that, you could
> easily set up a pg_hba file containing only "reject" entries.
I hadn't noticed you'd committed some changes around this until now. Thanks.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
