On 27 September 2015 at 20:43, Peter Geoghegan
<peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> It allows multiple vacuum processes to be initiated from vacuumdb at
>> the same time (i.e. in parallel), although not for the same tables.
>> What do you propose would be more appropriate?
>
> "Parallel vacuumdb jobs" seems better. I have seen cases where the
> existing wording caused confusion.
>
> I think that we will probably have actual parallel vacuum within the
> next couple of releases (probably vacuuming multiple indexes at the
> same time, using a list of TIDs in shared memory). The messaging here
> is important.
Okay, I've changed it to "Parallel vacuumdb jobs".
Thom
