Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby
Date
Msg-id CAA-aLv5r1w1N80oN1GU4rihzU3vOrCmTu=Ty1M9LxOZFbWJjiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby
List pgsql-hackers
On 23 February 2015 at 15:42, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2015-02-23 16:38:44 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> I unfortunately don't remember enough of the thread to reference it
> here.

Found the right keywords. The threads below
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/369698E947874884A77849D8FE3680C2%40maumau
and
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5CF4ABBA67674088B3941894E22A0D25@maumau

Yes, this seems to be virtually the same issue reported.  The trace looks the same except for RecordTransactionCommit.

--
Thom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)