Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
Date
Msg-id CAA-aLv5PzDqYV0zyP=zYfvMrN9DiLo6vsDe04PUJoYXRGVa=rQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 10:47, Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 29 Oct 2024, at 21:45, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> >
> > It clearly checks for interrupts, but when I saw this issue happen, it
> > wasn't interruptible.
>
> Perhaps, that was different multixacts?
> When I was observing this pathology on Standby, it was a stream of different reads encountering different multis.
>
> Either way startup can cancel locking process on it's own. Or is it the case that cancel was not enough, did you
actuallyneed termination, not cancel?
 

Termination didn't work on either of the processes.

Thom



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: protocol-level wait-for-LSN
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export