Re: pgsql: Introduce replication slots. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: pgsql: Introduce replication slots.
Date
Msg-id CAA-aLv4Owpf0H9ySaVjAjdSpxQxPNGRNwenAUt=61cJ8sCtdyg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Introduce replication slots.  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-committers
On 4 February 2014 05:19, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On 2014-02-01 16:47:47 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>>> > Introduce replication slots.
>>>> >
>>>> > Replication slots are a crash-safe data structure which can be created
>>>> > on either a master or a standby to prevent premature removal of
>>>> > write-ahead log segments needed by a standby, as well as (with
>>>> > hot_standby_feedback=on) pruning of tuples whose removal would cause
>>>> > replication conflicts.  Slots have some advantages over existing
>>>> > techniques, as explained in the documentation.
>>>> >
>>>> > In a few places, we refer to the type of replication slots introduced
>>>> > by this patch as "physical" slots, because forthcoming patches for
>>>> > logical decoding will also have slots, but with somewhat different
>>>> > properties.
>>>>
>>>> This patch changed basebackup.c so that it skips pg_replslot. It's OK
>>>> to skip all files in that directory, but an empty pg_replslot must be
>>>> included in the backup. Otherwise we cannot start PostgreSQL from
>>>> the backup taken via pg_basebackup. Attached patch fixes this problem.
>>>
>>> That's a pretty fair point. Not sure how that could escape my
>>> notice. The patch does look sane to me.
>>>
>>> I wonder if we additionally should add code to recreate pg_replslot on
>>> startup, similar to pg_xlog?
>>
>> Similar to pg_xlog/archive_status, not pg_xlog? That might be an option.
>> But I'm not inclined to do that for now. The fact that the essential
>> directory like
>> pg_replslot doesn't exist indicates the symptom of something strange. And,
>> changing that way might prevent us from detecting such symptom.
> To facilitate the user's life, I would be more inclined to do the following:
> 1) Have pg_replslot created if it does not exist in the base backup
> such as users are not surprised that there old scripts do not work
> anymore with 9.4

Yeah, a script I use to create a replication set-up no longer works.
Using latest Git master, this is causing standbys created with
pg_basebackup to fail to start.

 FATAL:  could not open directory "pg_replslot": No such file or directory

The pg_basebackup command used was:

pg_basebackup -D standby1 -h localhost -p 5530 -U rep_user

--
Thom


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pgsql: doc: Disable indentation of XHTML output
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce replication slots.