Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mariel Cherkassky
Subject Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Date
Msg-id CA+t6e1m1CFhrqfkkETUnCZyLoJFyRdXvtwUmxji3DoJoskAA5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12  (John Felix <johnfelix@zeelandnet.nl>)
Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hey Jeff,
This example was only used to show that pg96  had better perfomance than pg12 in a very simple case.
 In all the tests that I run most of the queries took less time on 9.6`s version.  I dont know why, but as you can see after disabling the parameter the simple test that I did showed different results.  I intend to test this theory tomorrow. I'm going to disable the parameter and run the same application flows that I have on both machines (9.6 vs 12 with zero value for the param).

I didnt send this mail after doing just one simple test, I have more than 100 queries that work better on 9.6 . If u have any explanation I will be happy to hear.
I'll update tomorrow once I'll have the results..

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Next
From: John Felix
Date:
Subject: Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12