Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul A Jungwirth
Subject Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CA+renyX006S=YHzYksPjJpgRJW0AjNSzKXqVz90O0zMR++QG5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Could you define what is an "inheritance-partitioned" table?  I know
> of partitioned tables, inherited tables and tables which make use
> of inheritance for partitioning (hence Inheritance Partitioning), but
> the paragraph you are adding introduces a new term in the whole tree.
> This makes things confusing and the previous paragraph is not, even if
> it is incorrect since f56f8f8 as Amit has noted.
>
> A simple rewording could be "tables using inheritance for
> partitioning".

I agree that sounds better. To avoid repeating it I changed the second
instance to just "inherited tables". New patch attached.

Paul

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Compile using the Visual Studio 2019