Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul A Jungwirth
Subject Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CA+renyVP0MPh-7cK=wSLoStHPFQX3LMPiYitvOwJKfqbS7ETDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:05 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure what value we would get from testing this with btree_gist,
> but if we wanted to do that, then adding a new test file to the
> btree_gist sql/ directory would seem reasonable to me.
>
> (I would make the test a little bit bigger than you had shown, like
> insert a few values.)
>
> If you want to do that, please send another patch.  Otherwise, I'm ok to
> commit this one.

I can get you a patch tonight or tomorrow. I think it's worth it since
btree_gist uses different strategy numbers than ordinary gist.

Thanks!
Paul



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add more sanity checks around callers of changeDependencyFor()
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Using BRIN indexes for sorted output