Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcWWpXTnOY8c5W2SRs_7pvqtKsKs1+MvwdR=MxpHF0VS-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:51 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:07 AM Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote:
> > I've attached v4 of the patch.
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Windows doesn't like sigaction:
>
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.15189
>
> I'm not sure if we classify this as a "frontend" program.  Should it
> be using pqsignal() from src/port/pqsignal.c?  Or perhaps just
> sigaction as you have it (pqsignal.c says that we require sigaction on
> all Unices), but #ifndef WIN32 around that stuff, since SIGUSR1 is
> never going to work anyway.

Unfortunately, patch also has some conflicts with the current master. I'll move
it to the next CF.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Kuzmenkov
Date:
Subject: Re: "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" is not quite as silly as it appears
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" is not quite as silly as it appears