Re: bgwriter and pg_locks - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Daniele Varrazzo
Subject Re: bgwriter and pg_locks
Date
Msg-id CA+mi_8a1WDd2ffqUftvpLEEHPA1dftqEntM6HvO5hyMh6mQhtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to bgwriter and pg_locks  (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com> wrote:
> In an attempt to get a hackfix for
http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1011203&group_id=1000411&atid=1376,I'm wonder if it's true that,
whenlooking at pg_locks, the only pid which will have virtualxid = '1/1' and virtualtransaction = '-1/0' will be the
bgwriter.That seems correct on all my dbs, but that's hardly a definitive test. 

Just stumbled upon the same issue. You got no reply here... maybe it's
worth contacting -hackers about it. I've tried googling around and
found no discussion about the bgwriter keeping that lock, except your
message.

Good luck, cheers!

-- Daniele


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dann Corbit
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow counting still true?
Next
From: niXman
Date:
Subject: Official C++ API for postgresql?