Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() - Mailing list psycopg

From Daniele Varrazzo
Subject Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()
Date
Msg-id CA+mi_8Z6RcuYetzTHBZV5fJqo6XCeSr=ao13M4G6XjDZiKFDfw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()  (Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it>)
Responses Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()  (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>)
List psycopg
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it> wrote:
> On 10/01/12 09:51, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>>
>> I just created a ticket against psycopg2, and Daniele asked me to bring
>> the issue on the list to open it to a wider audience. The ticket is here:
>>
>>
>> http://psycopg.lighthouseapp.com/projects/62710/tickets/88-use-lo_creat-when-possible-instead-of-lo_create
>
>
> The patch seems fine to me. Doesn't add any overhead and improves
> compatibility with an existing product. I vote +1 [that means "unless
> Daniele votes -1 I'll include it" ;)]

I don't know much about the difference between the two functions: if
anybody has any interesting story about them I'd be happy to know.
Meanwhile I'll make sure we have tests for both the code paths in the
patch.

-- Daniele

psycopg by date:

Previous
From: Federico Di Gregorio
Date:
Subject: Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()
Next
From: Daniele Varrazzo
Date:
Subject: Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()