Re: pg_reorg in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniele Varrazzo
Subject Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date
Msg-id CA+mi_8YiFosp7ueNOjRvNRz124Yqt4_Od3x4bzd6=eQE_HoToQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_reorg in core?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_reorg in core?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:

> As proposed by Masahiko, a single organization grouping all the tools (one
> repository per tool) would be enough. Please note that github can also host
> documentation. Bug tracker would be tool-dedicated in this case.

From this PoV, pgFoundry allows your tool to be under
http://yourtool.projects.postgresql.org instead of under a more
generic namespace: I find it a nice and cozy place in the url space
where to put your project. If pgFoundry will be dismissed I hope at
least a hosting service for static pages will remain.

-- Daniele



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Next
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion for --truncate-tables to pg_restore