Re: check_strxfrm_bug() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: check_strxfrm_bug()
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLZ74znssPvXYjrv6jt8Z71QCogsLiVEX0KE_1De_TDvA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: check_strxfrm_bug()  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: check_strxfrm_bug()
Re: check_strxfrm_bug()
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:52 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:40:14PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > +1 for getting rid of TRUST_STRXFRM.

+1

The situation is not improving fast, and requires hard work to follow
on each OS.  Clearly, mainstreaming ICU is the way to go.  libc
support will always have niche uses, to be compatible with other
software on the box, but trusting strxfrm doesn't seem to be on the
cards any time soon.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_collation.collversion for C.UTF-8